AUTOCOMP CORP / AUTONOMOUS COMPLIANCE OPERATIONS & EVIDENCE CAPTURE
Audit readiness that updates itself.
Authority stays human.
AutoComp continuously captures control evidence, maps it to compliance requirements, records an explainable audit trail, and routes consequential decisions to the right human reviewer across SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and evolving internal control programs.
See evidence arrive before the auditor asks for it.
An interactive product preview of continuous evidence capture, framework posture, exception queues, and append-only audit logging. The data shown below is a simulated AutoComp workspace—not a claim about a live customer environment.
CC6.1VerifiedA.5.1VerifiedCC9.2ReviewA.8.1VerifiedA.6.1CapturedEvidence hash sealed
Control test completed
Reviewer queue updated
Source snapshot versioned
Autonomous evidence work. Explicit human authority.
AutoComp can observe, reconcile, classify, draft, and route. Signatures, filings, material exceptions, and other consequential actions remain permissioned so the audit trail shows exactly where machine work ended and accountable human judgment began.
Review consequential decisions
A designated officer, compliance lead, or qualified professional reviews exceptions, signatures, filings, and material policy decisions.
Estimate how much audit preparation can move out of spreadsheets and inboxes.
Adjust organization size and target frameworks to model the workload that can potentially be reclaimed through automated evidence collection, reconciliation, and audit preparation. The calculator states its assumptions so the estimate stays transparent.
Uses a planning estimate of 110 fixed audit-preparation hours per framework plus 1.6 hours per employee, with 58% of that workload modeled as automatable evidence collection, reconciliation, and audit preparation.
Not a guarantee of savings. Actual effort varies by scope, maturity, auditor, systems, and control environment.Switch the system from observation to approval without hiding the handoff.
Registry Sentinel
Watch source changes, due dates, status shifts, and evidence without turning every signal into an automatic action.
One operating layer between obligation and execution.
Classify the event against entity scope, jurisdiction, deadlines, and known obligations with confidence scoring.
- source
- entity scope
- event
- obligation candidate
- trace
- CLS-4401 / policy 7
Every registry node carries its own version, freshness, and evidence state.
Specialists that disagree before the system acts.
Registry Sentinel
Monitors filing sources and provider evidence for changes, deadlines, and mismatches.
Never treats a missing source as proof of compliance.Records Steward
Reconciles corporate records, approvals, entity relationships, and document versions.
Drafts from verified facts only.Risk Classifier
Scores ambiguity, consequence, jurisdiction complexity, and stale-data exposure.
High-consequence uncertainty forces escalation.Execution Router
Routes approved actions to officers, registered agents, filing services, or counsel.
Cannot self-authorize formal execution.Corporate records should show how a decision was made—not just that a file exists.
AutoComp links source evidence, rule versions, generated drafts, approvals, and execution events so a human reviewer can reconstruct the operational history.
Risk Classifier marks the event as governance-relevant and routes it above autonomous drafting threshold.
- evidence id
- CLS-4401
- content hash
- d0a6…77be
- version time
- 22:01:14
- chain state
- APPEND ONLY
Autonomy has boundaries.
Observe automatically
Read public or authorized sources, normalize events, and create internal evidence without changing external records.
Draft automatically
Prepare routine corporate artifacts from approved templates when source facts and scope are verified.
Require approval
Any filing, signature, payment, officer action, or state-record change requires an authorized execution path.
Require professional review
Ambiguous legal classification, foreign qualification, disputes, enforcement matters, or material governance changes route to qualified counsel.
Map the control environment before automating it.
Start with entity scope, frameworks, source quality, evidence readiness, approval authority, and the decisions that must stay human-controlled.